Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimonthly (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft redirect. to wiktionary, which should've been done in the first place rather than taking it to AfD. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bimonthly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted as it is a dictionary definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 21:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 21:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Ibn Daud (talk) 21:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is a dictionary entry sourced to dictionaries. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wiktionary already has an entry for this term. Mccapra (talk) 05:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Jack Frost (talk) 10:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.